Zacco333
Member

***
The original "Flava". I did like "You" quite a bit and even liked this originally but now it's pretty laughable. The chorus is nowhere near as good as in "You" and his falsetto is a bit annoying here admittedly. Also pretty much everything about it can be heard in "You" so I have no desire to ever hear this song again to be honest. Not surprised it disappeared quickly.
Last edited: 04/11/2015 12:36

KingBandicoot
Member

****
Nice.<br><br>I enjoyed this as much on first listen as I did for "You".

bluezombie
Member

****
Decent song.

irelander
Member

***
I'm still not accustomed to his falsetto, quite off-putting really. While the melody does what it needs to do, I find this to be a little uninspired.

Chris A
Member

****
Solid track.

Hijinx
Member

**
A frustratingly dismal repackaging of his first hit, even thematically. I really hope this isn't a sign of things to come for the rest of his career; he surely has the potential to step out of this rut.

Der_Nagel
Member

***
Immerhin kein Cover des gleichnamigen grausigen James Blunt-Stücks…mir gefällt hier sein Falsettgesang nicht wirklich – 2.75…

BeansterBarnes
Member

**
Definitely a carbon copy of his much better hit 'You'.

timothy444
Member

****
Quite a nice song although not as memorable as his other single.

Snormobiel Beusichem
Member

*
▒ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~., <br>. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-., <br>. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:, <br>. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\, <br>. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,} <br>. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.} <br>. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./ <br>. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./ <br>. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./ <br>. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/ <br>. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .} <br>. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../ <br>. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../ <br>. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-” <br>. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\ <br>. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__ <br>,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-, <br>. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\ <br>. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\ <br>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__ <br>Verschrikkelijk. . . . . . . . `=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>-- ☺!!!

TravD
Member

***
It was alright, but 'You' was definitely better.

BP'93
Member

****
It's good, though "You" is superior.

LIFTER500
Member

***
About the same quality as You.

alleyt1989
Member

**
That strange vocal inflection in the pre-chorus is enough to put anyone off. Not for me.

savagegrant
Member

*****
OMG *that* high note he hits in the second pre-chorus makes me cream my jeans!

sanremo
Member

****
Ok